Money TransfersMoney Transfers

Anyone who’s spent any time whatsoever following the the Clinton’s over the years knows they established long ago that elite Democrats are above the law and can get away with any crime without legal consequences. But the question today is, does Hillary Clinton still qualify as an elite Democrat? We may know that by the reaction to the revelation that the media’s beloved Trump–Russia collusion story was 100% fabricated by the Clinton campaign.

Fox News Host Maria Bartiromo has been one of the key media figures who has taken the time to understand the granular details behind the government surveillance operation against Donald Trump.

Yesterday she was fired up about the latest court pleadings from special counsel John Durham and she delivered a rousing introduction for her show.

As I watched that video I’m reminded of how many times Lindsey Graham was on Maria’s show talking about the Russiagate hoax saying, “Believe me, I’m gonna get to the bottom of this.” Well, how’s your investigation coming along there, Senator Graham? Haven’t heard you mention it in a pretty long time. Anyway here’s the story…..

Attorneys for the 2016 presidential campaign of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton paid a technology company to “infiltrate” servers that were in Trump Tower, and after the election in the White House, in order to create an “inference” and “narrative” to link former President Donald Trump to Russia, a filing from Special Counsel John Durham said.

As The Blaze reports,

According to a report just filed by Special Counsel John Durham, lawyers for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign paid a technology company to “infiltrate” servers belonging to Trump Tower and the White House in order to fabricate a narrative connecting Donald Trump to Russia. …

The former chief investigator of the Trump-Russia probe for the House Intelligence Committee, Kash Patel, said the filing “definitively shows that the Hillary Clinton campaign directly funded and ordered its lawyers at Perkins Cole to orchestrate a criminal enterprise to fabricate a connection between President Trump and Russia.”

Over the past few weeks the Dems have been attempting to exhume the rotting carcass of the Hildabeast from beyond the grave because they’re desperate to find a replacement for the disaster of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. But in a poll from the TechnoMetrica Institute of Policy and Politics finds that two thirds of Democrats who have been keeping up with the case want her investigated, as well as 91% of Republicans.

As Robert Spencer pointed out recently,

Hillary Clinton recently decided that it would be an opportune time to release a video of herself weeping (suspiciously, as Stephen Kruiser noted) through the speech she had planned to give upon winning the 2016 presidential election. Considering the fact that Hillary is one of the most artificial and calculating human beings on the planet, the question must be asked: Why now?

Well the question of why now is pretty simple to answer:

An another poll has a humiliatingly low 22% of Americans and 37% of Democrats wanting Biden to run again in 2024; meanwhile, only 12% (and 16% of Democrats) want Kamala Harris to be the Democrats’ standard-bearer in the next presidential election.

It’s a good thing for the Hildabeast that most Democrats probably aren’t paying any attention to this story, due to the fact that their bought and paid for media outlets have avoided reporting on the case. And why should they, after all they’re collaborators in the “Russia! Russia! Russia!” lies and misinformation campaign. But that won’t last, not even the mainstream media will be able to keep a lid on this thing for much longer.

From The New York Post,

Michael Sussmann, the former law partner of Clinton campaign general counsel Mark Elias, was indicted in September for allegedly lying about his work for the Clinton campaign on a scheme linking Trump to a Russian bank. Sussmann has pleaded not guilty.

As part of the probe involving Sussmann, Durham said in a legal filing Friday that he discovered Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign paid a Web firm to “infiltrate’’ servers at Trump Towers and the White House to try to tie Trump to Russia.

The story was first broken by Fox News on Friday of last week:

Durham filed a motion on Feb. 11 focused on potential conflicts of interest related to the representation of former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussman, who has been charged with making a false statement to a federal agent. Sussman has pleaded not guilty.

The indictment against Sussman says he told then-FBI General Counsel James Baker in September 2016, less than two months before the 2016 presidential election, that he was not doing work “for any client” when he requested and held a meeting in which he presented “purported data and ‘white papers’ that allegedly demonstrated a covert communications channel” between the Trump Organization and Alfa Bank, which has ties to the Kremlin.

In that February 11 filing, in a section titled “Factual Background,” Durham said that Sussman “had assembled and conveyed the allegations to the FBI on behalf of at least two specific clients, including a technology executive (Tech Executive 1) at a U.S.-based internet company (Internet Company 1) and the Clinton campaign.”

It said that Sussman’s “billing records reflect” that he “repeatedly billed the Clinton Campaign for his work on the Russian Bank-1 allegations.”

The filing showed that the Tech Executive and Sussman met and talked to another law partner, who was serving as General Counsel to the Clinton campaign. That attorney, sources said, is Marc Elias, who worked at the law firm Perkins Coie.

Durham’s filing states that in July 2016, the tech executive worked with Sussman, a U.S. investigative firm retained by Law Firm 1 on behalf of the Clinton campaign, numerous cyber researchers and employees at multiple internet companies to “assemble the purported data and white papers.”

From the Durham report:

“In connection with these efforts, Tech Executive-1 exploited his access to non-public and/or proprietary Internet data,” the filing said. “Tech Executive-1 also enlisted the assistance of researchers at a U.S.-based university who were receiving and analyzing large amounts of Internet data in connection with a pending federal government cybersecurity research contract.”

“Tech Executive-1 tasked these researchers to mine Internet data to establish ‘an inference’ and ‘narrative’ tying then-candidate Trump to Russia,” Durham said. “In doing so, Tech Executive-1 indicated that he was seeking to please certain ‘VIPs,’ referring to individuals at Law Firm-1 and the Clinton campaign.”

President Trump responded to the new filing in an email from his Save America PAC.

“The latest pleading from Special Counsel Robert Durham provides indisputable evidence that my campaign and presidency were spied on by operatives paid by the Hillary Clinton Campaign in an effort to develop a completely fabricated connection to Russia. This is a scandal far greater in scope and magnitude than Watergate and those who were involved in and knew about this spying operation should be subject to criminal prosecution. In a stronger period of time in our country, this crime would have been punishable by death. In addition, reparations should be paid to those in our country who have been damaged by this,” he said.

Last month, Democrat pollster Doug Schoen teamed up with NYC pol Andrew Stein to rally the troops:

Several circumstances—President Biden’s low approval rating, doubts over his capacity to run for re-election at 82, Vice President Kamala Harris’s unpopularity, and the absence of another strong Democrat to lead the ticket in 2024—have created a leadership vacuum in the party, which Mrs. Clinton viably could fill. …

Given the likelihood that Democrats will lose control of Congress in 2022, we can anticipate that Mrs. Clinton will begin shortly after the midterms to position herself as an experienced candidate capable of leading Democrats on a new and more successful path.

The plan to accomplish this would be by the Hildabeast pretending to be moderate, just like Biden did in 2020.

Hillary Clinton remains ambitious, outspoken and convinced that if not for Federal Bureau of Investigation Director James Comey’s intervention and Russian interference that she would have won the 2016 election—and she may be right.

You read that correctly. Democrats actually expect you to believe the debunked Russian conspiracy narrative fabricated by the Hillary 2016 campaign. The media will be glad to assist in this regard however as I said already, the mainstream media will not be able to keep a lid on the Durham story for much longer..

The saga of Hillary Clinton is like Friday the 13th Part 50. The monster will not stay dead, no matter how many times it dies on screen.

Now, the system may just be too corrupt for the beast to end up in prison where she so deservedly belongs. But if Democrats start to see her as another albatross like Biden and Harris are seen today, at least we can stop worrying about the horror show of her clawing her way back into the White House.

COLLUSION BOMBSHELL: Russia intel accuses Hillary Clinton of approving the  Trump, Russia hoax - YouTube

Views: 47

By Jaz McKay

Jaz McKay is a long time veteran of Talk Radio, a story teller, a public speaker, an activist, and is the administrator, editor and publisher of The Deplorable Patriot website. He lives in Bakersfield, California with his wife and their dog and two cats. He’s been called the Uncommon Voice of the Common Man and is a Super Spreader of the Truth.